刊首语

  大家好,我是华尔街工程第一期的学员,两年前,当我还是一名在校大学生时,就怀着对华尔街这座金融圣殿的无限向往和成为一名驰骋国际金融市场的一流操盘手的梦想,加入了谭先生在国内举办的第一期华尔街职业操盘手培训班。如今,两年的时间过去了,回忆这两年的时间,我从两年前的一张白纸,到现在可以和师哥师姐们一样,初步达到了稳定赢利的程度,我们可以用自己的双手,去赚取华尔街的美金。虽然这不是很大的成绩,但是对于我来说,却是一个飞跃,我知道,当初看起来遥不可及的梦想,现在已经不再遥远,我正在慢慢的实现它。在国内,有多少投资者年复一年,日复一日,付出了大量的金钱,时间,精力,到最后依然两手空空,和他们比起来,我不知道要幸运多少倍,在刚刚踏入这个行业时,就受到了美国顶级职业操盘手正规,科学,专业化的训练,这样专业化的训练,不知道要使我少走多少弯路,少付出多少代价。我常常想,每一个行业的成功,基本道理都类似,股市亦不例外,可却偏偏有那么多的投资者,对此视而不见,面对波涛汹涌的金融市场,不管自己会不会游泳,水性如何,一厢情愿地投身进去,结果自然是浪花滔尽无数“英雄”。我深知专业化的训练对投资者是多么重要,我也想尽自己的微薄之力,能为大家做一些事情,我的信箱是jiangdiqun@gmail.com,希望能和大家交流。(蒋迪群文)
                      [本期成功周刊为方便英语学习爱好者,我们采用了中、英文对照的格式]

本期赠言

   拥有梦想是件好事,但是梦想与行动同在就更好了。信念的力量是巨大的,但是拥有信念的行动更强大。
                                 ——托马斯.罗伯特.更纳斯
   "It is good to dream, but it is better to dream and work.  Faith is mighty, but action with faith is mightier."
                                  ——Thomas Robert Gaines

本期文章


为什么将自己的思想强加给别人通常是没有意义的

  要完成伟大的事情太难了。而且当你必须依靠他人来取得成功的时候就更难了。通过命令解决每个难题,清除每个障碍并且实现所有的目标不是很好?只要说,“尽管去做,否则!”
  在我们日常商业生活的浮浮沉沉中,我们会面对的所有失望,所有阻碍以及所有惊奇,有时发出“命令”是再自然不过的事情了。偶尔我也会这么做,而且我可以证明,那感觉好极了。(“安,我不管他遇到多大的难题,”我大叫。“告诉他,明天下午之前解决掉并且使其正常运转,否则我就全部放弃。”)
  这会使你在情绪上自我满足,但是却丝毫不起作用。是的,你可以将偶尔出现的恶言相向变成措辞优雅的警告,但是大多数时候,你战胜困境所做的只有犹豫,寻找借口和被动的进攻。
  马克.斯库尔森引用英国哲学家阿尔佛雷德.诺斯.怀特黑德的话:
  “柏拉图曾说过,世间万物皆为说服命令的战利品。在作出较高的选择的时候,文明凭借其与生俱来的游说性,成为社会秩序的基本保障。但不可避免的,有时还是要求助于命令,这显露出文明的失败,无论是在整个社会还是残留的个体当中。”
  “现在,个体之间的交流,社会群体之间的交流都遵循下面两种方式中的一种:命令或说服。商业活动是通过说服的方式进行交流的最好的例子。战争,奴隶制,和政府强制执行就作为命令的例子。”
斯库尔森说,在一个群体当中要想评价一种文明质量的高低,就要通过说服支配其行为的程度,与命令刚好是相反的。
  “我所想象的充满责任感和自由的社会是这样的,”他说,“我们可以阻止罪恶的发生却无法禁止。我们可以提醒我们的孩子和学生意识到滥用毒品以及其他不负责任的行为所造成的后果。但即使在我们劝说之后,如果他们仍然想要继续吸食有害药品,那是他们的权利。在一个自由的社会里,只要没有威胁或侵犯到他人的权利和财产安全,每个人都有权利做他想要做的任何事情,无论这事是对的还是错的。而他们也必须承担他们的行为所产生的一切后果带来的痛苦,因为从中他们能够学会如何作出适当的选择。
  我们也许可以通过对某一地区以及某个年龄层的限制而阻止淫秽色情内容的传播,但是我们无法将那些选择秘密进行色情勾当的人送进监狱或是对他们进行罚款。如果在我们家附近开了一家成人书店,我们不会推行一条法律或是颁布一项法令;我们会派纠察员去这家书店然后阻止顾客进入。如果我们的宗教信仰要求我们不要在礼拜天营业,我们不会颁布礼拜天“兰色”法令强行要求商店在星期天关门;我们只要在星期天不光顾那里就可以了。如果我们不喜欢电视里过度的色情与暴力,我们不会写信给“通讯委员会”;我们只要假如联合抵制广告商产品的组织就可以了。
  几年前,有7到11家书店的老板使他们的书店远离了色情杂志,不是因为法律的强制执行,而是因为一些相关的市民劝说他们。这些行为真正体现了自由的的精神。
  如果说服是社会文明质量的象征,也许它也是一个公司或是其他组织领导品质的象征。大的公司都是那些看起来是自己运转的公司。员工们已经接受了团队的核心价值和目标并且进行自我激励,也激励他人去追求这些目标与价值——不是因为他们必须这样做,而是因为他们想做。
  作为我最大的客户,在AGP有大约400人心甘情愿的献身于艰苦漫长的工作中并且承担着额外的责任,只是为了实现公司的众多目标。BB,作为AGP的董事长兼首席执行官就是商业中的榜样,正如马克.斯库尔森所称赞的那种在社会中有出色表现的人一样。在他员工,同事以及合伙人的交往中,他是个人自由的强烈推崇者,是个人职责的说服倡导者,也是自由论价值的积极促进者。
  根据我所了解到的BB,我从未听过他下达命令或是发出威胁。有时,当他对某一行动过程非常有把握的时候,他可能会象这样说,“如果我是你,我会怎么怎么做。”——但是他通常会让员工自己做决定。
  几年前,当我和BB商量加入AGP帮助公司的发展的时候,一个年轻的主管打断了我们的谈话,问他对于一些问题他认为该如何解决。“我不知道,”他回答。“你认为我们该怎么做呢?”
  这听起来象是解决当时那个问题一个适当的回绝方式。但在我们的谈话中,当他一次又一次的重复同一句话的时候——至少出现了四次——我才意识到那并不只是回绝;这句话是从容的管理方式。
  从那时起,我学到了在工作中说服要比命令拥有更多优势:
  有时别人不听你的话。并且有时他们是对的。
  有时你会发现你所谓的好主意并不那么好。
  你的员工学会了理解你看问题的视角,并不只是服从你的命令。
  你的公司充满前途并不是有权力决定的而是理智与判断力。
  你树敌很少。
  现在我拥有一家成功的公司,拥有一支工作努力,忠诚而且富有创造力的员工队伍——不是因为他们按照要求工作多少小时或达到什么标准,而是他们受到公司目标的激励,在实现这些目标后带给他们的财政,社会和个人报酬也同样激励他们。


Why Forcing Your Will on Others Usually Doesn't Work

   It's so hard to accomplish something great. And it's made more difficult when you have to rely on others to succeed. Wouldn't it be wonderful to fix every problem, straighten out every hitch, and achieve all your goals by mandate? To say, "Just do it or else!"

  In the flux of our daily business life, with all the disappointments, obstacles, and surprises we face, it's completely natural to sometimes want to "force" an issue. I do so now and then, and I can testify that it feels good. ("Ann, I don't give a hoot what sort of problems he's facing," I shout. "Tell him to get it up and running by tomorrow afternoon or I'll pull all my business away.")

  It's emotionally satisfying, but pragmatically ineffective. Yes, you can goose the occasional ne'er-do-well with a well-worded threat, but most of the time all you'll get for your troubles are foot-dragging, excuses, and passive aggression.

  Mark Skousen quotes British philosopher Alfred North Whitehead:

   "The creation of the world, said Plato, is the victory of persuasion over force. Civilization is the maintenance of social order, by its own inherent persuasiveness as embodying the nobler alternative. The recourse to force, however unavoidable, is a disclosure of the failure of civilization, either in the general society or in a remnant of individuals."

   "Now the intercourse between individuals and between social groups takes one of these two forms: force or persuasion. Commerce is the great example of intercourse by way of persuasion. War, slavery, and governmental compulsion exemplify the reign of force."

  Skousen says you can measure the quality of civilization in a society by the degree to which its behavior is ruled by persuasion, as opposed to force.

   "My vision of a responsible free society," he says, "is one in which we discourage evil but do not prohibit it. We make our children and students aware of the consequences of drug abuse and other forms of irresponsible behavior. But after all our persuading, if they still want to use harmful drugs, that is their privilege. In a free society, individuals must have the right to do right or wrong as long as they don't threaten or infringe upon the rights or property of others. They must also suffer the consequences of their actions, as it is from consequences that they learn to choose properly.

   "We may discourage prostitution or pornography by restricting it to certain areas and to certain ages, but we will not jail or fine those who choose to participate in it privately. If an adult bookstore opens in our neighborhood, we don't run to the law and pass an ordinance; we picket the store and discourage customers. If our religion asks us not to shop on Sunday, we don't pass Sunday "blue" laws forcing stores to close; we simply don't patronize them on Sunday. If we don't like excessive violence and gratuitous sex on TV, we don't write the Federal Communications Commission; we join boycotts of the advertiser's products.

   "Several years ago, the owners of 7-11 stores removed pornographic magazines from their stores, not because the law required it, but because a group of concerned citizens persuaded them. These actions reflect the true spirit of liberty."

  If persuasion is a sign of the quality of civilization in society, perhaps it is also a sign of the quality of leadership in a business or other organization. Great businesses are those that seem to run themselves. The employees readily embrace the core values and goals of the organization and motivate themselves and others to pursue those goals and values -- not because they must, but because they want to.

  At AGP, my largest client, about 400 people work long, hard hours making sacrifices and taking on extra responsibility in order to achieve the company's many goals. AGP's chairman and CEO, BB, exemplifies in business what Mark Skousen praises in the social sector. He's a strong believer in personal liberty, a soft-spoken advocate of personal responsibility, and an active promoter of libertarian values in his relationships with employees, colleagues, and associates.

  In all the time I've known BB, I've never heard him issue a command or make a threat. Sometimes, when he's very sure of a course of action, he might say something like, "If I were you, I'd do such and such" -- but he always leaves it up to the employee to make the final decision.

  When I talked to BB a few years ago about joining up with him to help AGP grow, a young executive interrupted us to ask what he thought should be done about some problem. "I don't know," he replied. "What do you think we should do?"

  That seemed like a pretty "laid-back" way of handling that concern. But when he did the exact same thing again and again -- at least four times during the time we talked together -- I realized it was much more than laid back; it was a deliberate approach to management.

  What I've learned since then is that there are many advantages to using persuasion rather than force in business. Among them:

  Sometimes, people don't listen to you. And, sometimes, they are right.

  Sometimes, you discover that your good idea isn't so good after all.

  Your employees learn to understand your vision, not just to obey your commands.

  Your business becomes one with a future that is determined by reason rather than authority.

  You make fewer enemies.

  I now have a successful business staffed by hard-working, loyal, and creative people -- not because they are required to work certain hours or meet certain standards but because they are inspired by the goals of the business and are motivated by the financial, social, and personal rewards that come to them by achieving those goals.

小幽默

  一个会计最近总是很难入睡,所以他去看医生。
  会计:“医生,我总是在晚上睡不着。”
  医生:“你试着数羊来帮助你入睡了吗?”
  会计:“就是这个问题——我数错了,然后我花了三个小时试图找出错误所在。”
  An accountant is having a hard time sleeping and goes to see his doctor.
  Accountant: "Doctor, I just can't get to sleep at night."
  Doctor: "Have you tried counting sheep?"
  Accountant: "That's the problem - I make a mistake and then spend three hours trying to find it."

成功帖士


  以下四条规则可以保持你的会议的新鲜和高效:

 Keep your meetings fresh and productive by following these four rules:

  1、准时开始。如果会议缺少某个人就不能进行(而这个人做事又总是拖拖拉拉的),就事先安排一个十五分钟的会前任务报告。如果他准时到达,利用这15分钟讨论重要问题。如果他迟到了1 5分钟,也不会耽误什么事。

 Start on time. If there's someone without whom the meeting can't take place (and who's often tardy), schedule a pre-meeting debriefing with him 15 minutes beforehand. If he gets there on time, use that 15 minutes to discuss the big issues. If he's 15 minutes late, he won't hold things up.

  2、 在会议召开的前一天给每个参加者发一份简单明了的会议程序表。

 Distribute a succinct agenda to all participants the day before the meeting.

  3、 明确并强调每一个问题的时间限制。明确了行动的细节,完成记录,并且已经完成分派之后,关于这个问题的讨论就要结束。

 Set and enforce a strict time limit for each agenda item. Discussion of each item should end when a specific action has been determined, written down, and assigned.

  4、 每五六个会议之后,征求意见改进你组织以及运行会议的方法。

  Every five or six meetings, ask for suggestions to improve the way you're organizing and running the proceedings.

刊尾语

  天下熙熙皆为利来,天下攘攘皆为利往,物欲横流的现今社会,股市有如一面明镜,有的人映出了贪婪,卑劣,有的人则映出了高尚和睿智。在和谭先生不断熟悉,相处的两年里,我们岂止仅仅在学习交易,我们更被谭先生巨大的人格魅力所深深吸引。从谭先生的身上,我深深的懂得,学习交易之路,亦是学习如何对待生活,完善自身,提高人生境界之路。
  在金融领域,中国已经落后美国几百年,“内战内行,外战外行”已成为国内投行的真实写照;严重缺乏能在国际金融市场熟练操作的专业人才是国内金融界的现状;中航油,中储棉用巨幅的亏损对这一现状进行着深刻的诠释。谭先生满怀热忱回到国内,根本目的就是能够不断培养一批批能在国际金融市场上大显身手的中国交易员。如果说一个人的力量尚显单薄,但我坚信,星星之火,可以燎原,一代又一代优秀的中国交易员,必将站在世界金融之颠。

[总编:吴丽雯  本期编辑:田雨  翻译:一乔  供稿:健飞  版面设计:田雨 ]

《成功周刊》是“成功俱乐部(http://www.05178.com)”的网上杂志。假如你喜欢《成功周刊》,请来信告诉我们你的意见和建议,并请转发和介绍给你的朋友们。谢谢每一位朋友的关心和支持!